Chemical Injection System Design, Optimization & Troubleshooting
The key to effective resolution of flow assurance issues is via sound production chemistry and chemical systems design, commissioning and startup.
Our Services
Chemical Injection System Design
Chemical Vendor Qualification
Chemical Injection Optimization & Troubleshooting
Viking’s Chemical Systems Engineering (CSE) team is engaged in all aspects of chemical-related technology for onshore and offshore facilities.
The Viking Chemical Systems team’s expertise is leveraged in all phases of capital project development to ensure that the design parameters chosen yield the best possible performance of the system.
The Viking CSE team’s support acts as a focal point to develop, manage and maintain a comprehensive chemical engineering strategy keeping in mind Viking’s systems perspective. This allows us to maximize the net value of the asset at all stages of the design, commissioning and production process.
Viking strives to provide the project with the Best Available Technology (BAT) in the field of Chemical Systems Management and Engineering to suit the requirements of the operator and the asset in question.
Chemical Injection System Design
Viking’s Chemical Systems team incorporates past expertise, industry experience, project based learning and design experience in crafting a fit-for-purpose chemical injection system to provide flow assurance specific to each project.
Viking evaluates chemical priority, pumping rates and sparing along with chemical storage requirements and umbilical sizing layouts.
Develops chemical management plans with selected chemical vendors for assets at the design stage as well as for producing facilities.
The Viking Production Chemistry team also works with the Viking Corrosion and Materials team to ensure the flow assurance strategy for the asset is robust and fit for purpose for the full design life.
Flow Assurance/ Chemical Technology/ Production Chemistry Interface Management
Chemical Process Design and Development
Core Production Chemistry Solutions
Chemical Injection System Design Guidance and Operability Review
Our Chemical Injection System Design Services
Injection System Optimization
Scale & Corrosion Modeling
Corrosion Control Programs
H2S Partitioning Studies
Reservoir Souring Risk Assessment
Chemical Vendor Qualification & Selection
Viking’s Chemical Vendor Qualification procedure for technical and business compliance provides a transparent procedural overview of the process. This clear perspective provides well-defined roles and responsibilities for each associated member associated with the qualification process.
Viking manages chemical vendor qualifications and selections and is proud to possess one of the best interface management teams in the industry.
Our Chemical Vendor Qualification & Selection Services
Development of chemical functional and testing requirements
Organizing vendor site visits
Development of a comprehensive summary of the qualification results for each chemical vendor.
Chemical Injection Optimization & Troubleshooting
Viking’s Chemical Systems team determines what issues may cause an existing chemical system to not perform to the operators’ desired specifications and will deliver a course of action designed to mitigate these issues to ensure best performance.
Viking will support the rework of the system and keep track of the performance whether it be a complete redesign and rebuild or simple modifications to the existing system.
Chemical Treatment and Optimization
Operational Flow Assurance and Production Chemistry
Process System Optimization
Chemical Injection System Operability Review
Consult Our Specialist
President & CRO
Karthik’s focus is growing the firm internationally, overseeing the level of value and service that our clients have come to expect from us, and maximizing value to our shareholders.
Related Resources
The objective of this GATEKEEPER is to provide a high-level overview of the model commonly used in the industry to estimate the wax deposition.
The design and development of a viable, robust wax management strategy relies upon the economical evaluation of available management techniques.
Wax management strategies developed during Front End Engineering Design (FEED) can mitigate or perhaps even prevent these costs. The goal of this GATEKEEPER series is to provide high-level insight into the planning, execution, and maintenance of wax management strategies.
This GATEKEEPER discusses the various bacteria testing options that are available, which can be used to validate MPN results, as well as the mitigation and remediation techniques that can be used to decrease the probability or severity of MIC to pipeline infrastructure.
This GATEKEEPER provides an overview of the decisions which are the truly important outcomes from this process, and outlines the risks we incur by setting our scale management and associated field design philosophies early in the life of a project.
This GATEKEEPER will discuss the key physical and chemical characteristics of each production chemical that must be evaluated prior to use in a subsea production system.
The amine selected, as well as the concentration of the solution used, will result in different selectivity of H2S over CO2, mole-to-mole acid gas loading, and degradation of the amine.
This GATEKEEPER will discuss the use of triazine as a liquid H2S scavenger.
Corrosion modeling is a vital tool in the pre-Front End Engineering Design (pre-FEED), FEED, and operational stages of the life of pipeline and equipment systems.
Proper sizing of the flowlines and risers coupled with optimal choking and gas-lift will greatly reduce the risk of slugging and help in efficient management of slugs throughout the life of the field.
Paraffin precipitation and deposition in flowlines and pipelines is an issue impacting the development of deepwater subsea hydrocarbon reservoirs.
While one test cannot give comprehensive results, a combination of testing including genetic testing will be able to provide a more reliable and complete picture of the bacteria in the system than the use of MPN alone.
This article compares the common approaches to specifying chemical cleanliness and subsequently presents high-level guidance that can be used to select appropriate quality control criteria for those chemicals deployed through long-distance umbilicals to subsea and sub-surface injection locations
The objective of this article is to summarize the main requirements of the permit, identify changes from the previous permit, and call out edits between the draft and final issue of the permit as these pertain to the discharge of produced waters and other treated waters from offshore production and water injection facilities.
Asphaltenes are large, complex organic components present in the oil phase, along with resins, aromatic hydrocarbons, and alkanes (saturated hydrocarbons). Resins play an important role in stabilizing asphaltenes in crude oil. When the resins get destabilized, (under unfavorable pressure-temperature conditions) asphaltenes can agglomerate and deposit.
These work effectively on dispersed, O&G; however, these systems do not effectively remove water soluble organics (WSOs). Where WSOs exist in concentrations greater than 29 mg/l, conventional produced water treating systems cannot achieve GoM overboard discharge limits.
Methanol (MeOH) is widely used in multiple applications in the offshore oil and gas industry.
In subsea oil production systems, hydrate mitigation methods during steady state operation are almost always based around heat conservation.
Iron solid formation in the MEG regeneration system has been a recurring issue in wet gas pipeline systems.
In this 2-part GATEKEEPER series, we will discuss how centrifugal pumps work and what information is needed to determine the pump needed for a particular application.
In part 2, horsepower, efficiency and NPSH will be discussed which will lead to a final centrifugal pump selection.
This GATEKEEPER discusses various options available for ballast water tank treatment in these circumstances.
Related Project Experience
Complete Field Integrity Project including wells, gathering lines, and facilities. Corrosion and Chemical Optimization and Development of a Viking Proprietary Tool for integrity.
GATE was requested to determine the potential risks involved in waterflood for the Neptune and Shenzi fields as a means to determine whether waterflood was a viable option for enhanced oil recovery. Based on this, GATE developed a waterflood philosophy document that details the problems and possible mitigation procedures for BHP’s use in determining whether or not to waterflood.
GATE provided in-house production chemistry support for the Horn Mountain, Atlantis and Thunder Horse assets.
GATE undertook a chemical vendor qualification process on behalf of Noble to procure the best suited chemical and chemical support for both the Aseng and Alen assets based on their fluids, and system along with their specific operational needs.
GATE leverages each chemical vendors based on performance of chemical, lab, ability to meet supply demands and upsets, price, experience and key criteria important to contractor and operator.
GATE undertook a rigorous qualification process on behalf of the client to BHP to procure the best suited chemicals and chemical support for both the Neptune and Shenzi assets based on their fluids, and system along with their specific operational needs.
BP Pipeline oversees the operation of 9 total oil and gas export systems from more than 20 different platforms in the GoM. The pipeline systems transport almost half-million barrels of oil and hundreds of MMSCF of gas daily from the producing platforms to onshore processing facilities.
The FAMP has been developed for BP Pipeline assets to ensure proper working of the high volume systems by organizing and delegating between operators, facilities, laboratories and onshore offices. By facilitating the review of system performance and operation, this information provides the basis of a continuous improvement approach.
GATE was responsible for formulating a detailed flow assurance strategy for the successful operation of Juniper production system. The project involved extensive cross-functional interaction, detailed study of the lessons learnt from similar fields in the region (offshore Trinidad), simulating a wide variety of what-if scenarios (both steady state and transient) to draft the flow assurance strategy and operability logic for optimized production.
GATE was involved in formulating the strategy for hot oil circulation and pigging operations for Chissonga. The hot oil circulation study involved optimization of the hot oil injection pressures and temperatures required to displace the cold dead leg in the pigging loop following an extended shutdown. The pigging study involved optimizing the pigging frequency, topsides injection pressures and pig velocities taking into account the production function for the entire life of the field.
The project involved detailed steady state and transient modeling and analysis of gas and oil production systems. Strategies were developed for pigging based on the liquid dropout pattern and fluid velocities.
Phase envelopes of the individual gas streams and gas-mixtures were studies in detail using the software PVTSIM and optimum operating pressures and temperatures were suggested to minimize the liquid drop out.
GATE was responsible for the flow assurance modeling to support Detailed Engineering, Final Commissioning and Startup and Operations Readiness for the Aseng Development. This included steady-state and transient modeling of the production, gas injection, and water injection systems.
GATE was approached by Tullow to provide a detailed view of the several options available in the industry for remediation of hydrate plugs in oil and gas lines, merits and demerits of each strategy and their applicability to the Jubilee field. The project also involves developing detailed procedures for hydrate remediation/removal for Jubilee considering the available topsides and subsea infrastructure.
GATE was involved in performing studies on the gas export line at different flowrates and platform pressures using the transient analysis software OLGA®. This includes calculation of the gas compressor requirements considering the characteristic curves and limitation on the compressor power) was calculated for a fixed export pipe ID.
After an in-line inspection of a pipeline in West Africa, a client discovered significant wall loss in the first three miles of the line. The tool also returned significant wax deposits, casting doubt on the current wax management efforts in place.
The wells producing to the pipeline historically produced H2S; however, the worst offenders were shut-in quickly after it was discovered that they were producing extremely high concentrations of the sour gas.
Developed standalone tool for operator to proactively monitor flow assurance risks based on the field specific reservoir fluids, subsea infrastructure and current operating conditions.
A client operating domestically and internationally needed expert technical support for materials and corrosion control. Their senior management came to Viking for a proposal to provide a variety of consultancy services to cover the following essential needs: materials selection, failure analysis, corrosion monitoring, technical assurance for procurement, and risk assessment.
A Gulf of Mexico (GoM) operator in the process of decommissioning one of its fields requested the engineering assessment of a blockage existing in their flowline-riser. The reservoir fluid characteristics and the field’s operational history were extensively reviewed. The review indicated hydrates to be the likely cause of the blockage.
A West Africa field operator witnessed an abnormal increase in pressure topsides when the flowline circulation pump was used to pump dead oil into the production line. No increase in subsea pressure was observed. Operational history prior to blockage hinted at the possibility of the presence of one or both wax and hydrate blockages in the production line. Depressurization options were limited by the blocked gas lift line.